‘This Is No Bluff’: Sanders Vows to Filibuster Military Budget to Force Senate Vote on $2,000 Checks 

‘This Is No Bluff’: Sanders Vows to Filibuster Military Budget to Force Senate Vote on $2,000 Checks

“It would be unconscionable, especially after the House did the right thing, for the Senate to simply leave Washington without voting on this.”

By Jake Johnson

Sen. Bernie Sanders is vowing to filibuster the Senate’s upcoming attempt to override President Donald Trump’s veto of the annual military spending bill in an effort to force a clean vote on House-passed legislation that would provide one-time $2,000 direct payments to struggling Americans.

“This week on the Senate floor [Republican Majority Leader] Mitch McConnell wants to vote to override Trump’s veto of the $740 billion defense funding bill and then head home for the New Year,” the Vermont senator said in a statement late Monday. “I’m going to object until we get a vote on legislation to provide a $2,000 direct payment to the working class.”

“We can force the Senate to stay in session until the New Year. This is no bluff.”
—Warren Gunnels, Sanders staff director

“Let me be clear: If Senator McConnell doesn’t agree to an up or down vote to provide the working people of our country a $2,000 direct payment, Congress will not be going home for New Year’s Eve,” Sanders added. “Let’s do our job.”

Sanders’ statement came shortly after the Democrat-controlled House overwhelmingly passed the CASH Act, which would increase the direct payments in the new coronavirus relief law from $600 to $2,000 and include some people who were originally deemed ineligible for the checks, such as adult dependents. The measure passed by a 275-134 vote, with 44 House Republicans joining 231 Democrats in approving the bill.

Following the House vote, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) reiterated his intention to try to pass the CASH Act on Tuesday, declaring that “every Senate Democrat is for this relief.”

But McConnell has not committed to allowing a vote on the bill, intransigence that prompted Sanders’ vow to hold up a Senate vote to override Trump’s veto of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The House voted to override the president’s veto Monday night.

“At noon tomorrow, McConnell is expected to ask for Unanimous Consent to vote on the veto override of the $740 billion defense bill,” said Warren Gunnels, Sanders’ staff director. “Bernie will object until we get a vote on $2,000 direct payments. We can force the Senate to stay in session until the New Year. This is no bluff.”

In an interview with Politico, Sanders said that “it would be unconscionable, especially after the House did the right thing, for the Senate to simply leave Washington without voting on this.”

“The American people are desperate,” the Vermont senator added, “and the Senate has got to do its job before leaving town.”

Politico noted that “the Vermont independent can’t ultimately stop the veto override vote, but he can delay it until New Year’s Day and make things more difficult for the GOP… Though veto overrides can be filibustered, as Sanders plans to do, it is a rare procedural move because the veto override already requires 67 votes and the filibuster is simply a delay tactic, according to the Congressional Research Service.”

 

While Sanders may not have the power to single-handedly kill the NDAA veto override, The American Prospect‘s David Dayen wrote Monday that the Vermont senator “has the procedural means at his disposal to keep the Senate in session all the way to New Year’s Day, inconveniencing senators of both parties, particularly the incumbent Republicans from Georgia, who are in their final full week of campaigning for runoff elections on January 5.”

Dayen reported that Sanders will be operating “with the backing of the Senate Democratic caucus.”

As Dayen explained:

In order to get through the week without a clean vote on the $2,000 payments, Senate Majority Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) will have to object numerous times to Sanders’ pleas to bring up the bill…

The Senate operates on the principle of unanimous consent. It’s not impossible to get things done if one senator objects, but it’s quite a bit slower. The majority needs to hold votes and waste time to muscle past an objecting senator. For this reason, Sanders can prevent quick passage of the defense bill override, the only thing McConnell really wants to accomplish in the last week of the Senate session.

This ramps up pressure on McConnell to just hold a vote on the $2,000 checks. Senators don’t want to be stuck in Washington on New Year’s Eve or New Year’s Day if they can prevent it…

McConnell has options to eventually get to the defense bill vote. He can move to end debate, known as a cloture vote, and push past Sanders’ objection. However, he cannot do that on Tuesday, because he won’t have enough senators in the building to win a floor vote.

In a tweet late Monday, Sanders pointed to new Data for Progress polling showing that 78% of likely U.S. voters—84% of Democrats, 73% of Republicans, and 74% of Independents—support a $2,000 direct relief check.

“The House approved a $2,000 direct payment,” Sanders wrote. “Let the Senate vote, Mitch!”

Source: ‘This Is No Bluff’: Sanders Vows to Filibuster Military Budget to Force Senate Vote on $2,000 Checks | Common Dreams News

 

 

 

‘Yes, Exactly,’ Say Progressives After Pence Warns Democrats Will ‘Make Rich Poorer and Poor More Comfortable’ 

Yes, Exactly,’ Say Progressives After Pence Warns Democrats Will ‘Make Rich Poorer and Poor More Comfortable’

“You have to be all sorts of twisted to think ‘making poor people more comfortable’ is a bad thing.”

By Julia Conley

The grassroots organization People for Bernie on Tuesday advised the Democratic Party to take a page from an unlikely source—right-wing Vice President Mike Pence—after Pence told a rally crowd in Florida that progressives and Democrats “want to make rich people poorer, and poor people more comfortable.”

“Good message,” tweeted the group, alerting the Democratic National Committee to adopt the vice president’s simple, straightforward description of how the party can prioritize working people over corporations and the rich.

Suggesting that a progressive approach to the economy will harm the country—despite the fact that other wealthy nations already invest heavily in making low- and middle-income “more comfortable” by taxing corporations and very high earners—Pence touted the Republicans’ aim to “cut taxes” and “roll back regulations.”

The vice president didn’t mention how the Trump administration’s 2017 tax cuts overwhelmingly benefited wealthy households and powerful corporations, with corporate income tax rates slashed from 35% to 21%, corporate tax revenues plummeting, and a surge in stock buybacks while workers saw “no discernible wage increase” according to a report released last year by the Economic Policy Institute and the Center for Popular Democracy.

Similarly, the Republican Party’s recent attempts to roll back regulations include measures that have actively harmed working families, including the administration’s termination of overtime protections for workers—resulting in an estimated $1.2 billion in lost earnings—and of requirements that federal contractors meet labor and wage standards.

While the GOP during the coronavirus pandemic has allowed enhanced unemployment benefits to expire and cited concerns over the federal deficit while blocking legislation to offer Americans a second round of $1,200 stimulus checks—despite the fact that the deficit has grown by trillions of dollars under President Donald Trump—progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have consistently called for robust economic relief for workers.

Along with Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, Sanders introduced legislation to provide Americans with monthly payments of $2,000 in May, saying the $1,200 direct payment included in the CARES Act last March was “not nearly enough.”

 

In August, Sanders also introduced a bill to tax the “obscene wealth gains” of U.S. billionaires during the pandemic, which would raise at least $420 billion—a sum that would allow the popular Medicare program to pay all out-of-pocket healthcare expenses for everyone in the U.S. for a year.

Pence’s description of progressive goals was “exactly” correct, author and commentator Anand Giridharadas tweeted.

“Yes, and what’s wrong with making poor people more comfortable?” asked Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).

The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen denounced Pence for suggesting the government should not prioritize the wellbeing of Americans who are struggling financially during a pandemic, including an estimated 50 million people expected to face food insecurity this year.

“You have to be all sorts of twisted to think ‘making poor people more comfortable’ is a bad thing,” tweeted the group.

Source: ‘Yes, Exactly,’ Say Progressives After Pence Warns Democrats Will ‘Make Rich Poorer and Poor More Comfortable’ | Common Dreams News

 

 

 

‘Slap in the Face for People Suffering Across the Country’: Critics Slam Watered-Down Covid Relief Deal 

‘Slap in the Face for People Suffering Across the Country’: Critics Slam Watered-Down Covid Relief Deal

“Congress must pass this bill to address the immediate need, but let’s be clear: this should be considered a down payment at best.”

By Kenny Stancil

In the wake of Sunday night’s agreement on a roughly $900 billion Covid-19 relief package that is far smaller than economists say is necessary, progressives argued that the “slap-in-the-face” bill must be passed to help stem the suffering of working-class Americans but that much more will be needed to address the crisis that has claimed more than 300,000 lives and 20 million jobs in the United States so far.

“To say this relief package is a day late and a dollar short is an understatement to say the least,” said People’s Action director George Goehl in a statement released Sunday night.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his fellow congressional Republicans “prioritized the profits of the 1% over the well-being of everyone else since this pandemic began,” Goehl said. “The result is a diluted bill that’s barely a Band-Aid, but definitely a slap in the face for people suffering across the country.”

“When the history books are written about this pandemic,” Goehl added, McConnell and the GOP “will be remembered as heartless souls who played politics with people’s lives by blocking life-saving relief for months.”

The legislation includes $600 direct cash payments to Americans who earned $75,000 or less in 2019, though that hard-fought-for sum is meager compared to what other OECD countries have allocated to workers, including several nations that subsidized wages by 75% to 100% and didn’t have gaps of more than 260 days between relief packages.

In addition, the bill extends paid sick leave benefits and augments jobless benefits by $300 per week for 11 weeks, averting a catastrophic post-Christmas Day scenario in which 12 million people in the U.S. would lose unemployment insurance. It also provides much-needed funding—$10 billion for childcare, $13 billion for nutrition aid, $25 billion in rental assistance, and $82 billion for schools, as Common Dreams reported Sunday.

Progressives defeated the corporate immunity provision McConnell has spent months pushing for, but urgently needed fiscal aid for state and local governments was also cut from the bill.

Although specific details of the agreement are still emerging, the package will reportedly leave out hazard pay for frontline workers while the Washington Post reported Sunday that Republicans extracted tax deductions for “three-martini” business meal expenses “in exchange for… tax credits for low-income families.” And, according to Matt Bruenig of the People’s Policy Project, the legislation excludes 13.5 million adult dependents.

The bill is “not nothing, but it’s obviously inadequate…during an economic meltdown that has been punctuated by mass starvation and intensifying poverty,” the Daily Poster’s David Sirota wrote Sunday night. “For comparison, only three years ago, Republicans passed a $1.5 trillion tax cut that enriched the wealthiest 1% of households.”

AFSCME president Lee Saunders in a statement released Sunday night called the new Covid-19 relief package “a slap in the face to frontline public services workers—including nurses, first responders, sanitation workers, corrections officers, and others—who have risked their lives and livelihoods during this pandemic.”

 

While the pandemic-driven economic slowdown has led to sharp declines in tax revenue, states and localities do not share the federal government’s ability to run deficits. Citing the devastating impact of the crisis on municipal budgets across the country, Saunders pointed out that “already, 1.3 million frontline public service workers have been thanked for their heroism with pink slips, with more than a million more on the chopping block.”

“Congress has turned its back on out frontline heroes and the communities they serve,” Saunders said, adding that neighborhoods across the country will “pay the price with further job losses and cutbacks in essential services.”

The legislation could have been even worse, Goehl pointed out, had it not been for the advocacy of progressive elected officials like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and the Congressional Progressive Caucus as well as “grassroots organizations turning up the heat.”

“We fought tooth and nail to get people direct cash payments, even though we know a one-time, $600-per-person check isn’t nearly enough to survive,” Goehl noted. “We also pushed hard to make sure both extended and enhanced unemployment insurance and direct cash assistance were included instead of pitted against each other. By standing up for workers, we kept corporations accountable by rejecting the corporate liability shield.”

Goehl said that “Congress must pass this bill to address the immediate need, but let’s be clear: this should be considered a down payment at best.”

While the bill extends the CDC eviction moratorium through January 31 and provides $25 billion in emergency rental assistance, “Congress should have done much more to address the housing crisis faced by tens of millions of people,” he said. “We need a complete moratorium on evictions, rent and mortgage cancellation, and erasure of pandemic-related housing debts. Rental assistance just means the landlord gets paid with no strings attached, not even a commitment not to evict the tenant next month if they take the money.”

In addition, the People’s Action director emphasized the need for “funding for state and local governments to prevent deep cuts to essential local programs, services, and the workforce.”

Alluding to the significance of the January 5 runoff contests in Georgia that will determine which party controls the Senate, Goehl said progressives should be “ready to fight for robust relief and economic recovery under President-elect Biden.”

Sirota cautioned that “if Democrats don’t win the Georgia Senate races and gain control of the upper chamber… it will almost certainly become far harder to pass emergency relief bills through Congress.”

With Biden in the White House, Sirota said, the GOP will have “an even bigger incentive to try to starve the country for their own political gain.”

Source: ‘Slap in the Face for People Suffering Across the Country’: Critics Slam Watered-Down Covid Relief Deal | Common Dreams News