Democrats Urged to Fight for Bigger Relief Checks as Lame-Duck Trump Privately Backs Payments as Big as $2,000 

Democrats Urged to Fight for Bigger Relief Checks as Lame-Duck Trump Privately Backs Payments as Big as $2,000

“Pro-tip for Democrats: Don’t ever let Donald effing Trump be pushing for bigger direct relief checks than you are,” said one progressive activist.

by Jake Johnson

In the wake of news that lame-duck President Donald Trump on Thursday was dissuaded by White House aides from publicly demanding stimulus checks as large as $2,000 in the next relief package, progressives called on Democratic leaders to use the leverage offered by Trump’s behind-the-scenes push to demand more than the $600 payments currently on the table.

The Washington Post‘s Jeff Stein reported late Thursday that the outgoing president “was in the middle of formally drafting his demand for the larger payments when White House officials told him that doing so could imperil delicate negotiations over the economic relief package.”

“Trump is privately demanding $2,000 stimulus checks. McConnell is quietly fretting over Georgia. Democrats control the leverage, they should demand larger stimulus in the package being negotiated.”
—Sawyer Hackett, senior adviser to Julián Castro

Trump was preparing to demand one-time direct payments of “at least” $1,200 per person and as large as $2,000, according to Stein. “Trump ultimately did not call for the larger stimulus payments,” Stein noted. “His only public comments on the matter came in the morning when he wrote that ‘stimulus talks [are] looking very good.'”

Direct payments of $1,200 per person would be double the size of the checks congressional negotiators are currently considering in a relief package that could be finalized and passed within days. Progressive lawmakers, and one Republican senator, have been vocally urging congressional leaders to include larger direct payments as tens of millions of people across the U.S. struggle to afford basic necessities.

Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced an amendment last week calling for payments of $1,200 per working-class adult and $500 per child; members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are publicly demanding checks of “at least” $2,000.

 

While a substantial change in the size of direct payments is unlikely at this stage of the relief negotiations, Democrats are facing pressure to use Trump’s apparent desire for larger payments and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) expressed need for a deal to fight for the inclusion of bigger checks.

“Trump is privately demanding $2,000 stimulus checks. McConnell is quietly fretting over Georgia,” Sawyer Hackett, senior adviser to Julián Castro, tweeted Thursday, referring to the Kentucky Republican’s warning Wednesday that Sens. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.) “getting hammered” over the GOP’s opposition to direct payments.

“Democrats control the leverage, they should demand larger stimulus in the package being negotiated,” Hackett said.

Others lamented Democratic leaders’ failure to push for larger checks earlier in the process and argued they have let McConnell walk all over them in the latest round of relief talks.

 

“Democrats are supposed to be party of the people and yet it’s Trump who is asking for bigger stimulus checks,” tweeted Murshed Zaheed of Megaphone Strategies. “Unacceptable that neither Biden nor Pelosi/Schumer are pushing publicly for bigger stimulus checks ($2,500) when they have leverage over McConnell.”

Progressive organizer Kai Newkirk added:

Adam Jentleson, public affairs director at Democracy Forward and former aide to retired Sen. Harry Reid, said Thursday that “with Mnuchin endorsing a $1.8 trillion proposal in October that included $1,200 checks, $400 UI, and $300 billion in state/local, and with Trump still actively trying to increase direct checks, there is simply no way to argue that Dem leaders secured the best deal possible.”

“McConnell ate their lunch,” Jentleson argued, warning against the assumption that Congress will be able to pass another relief package under a Biden presidency. “Republicans will repeat the obstructionist playbook they ran under Obama.”

“Thanks to ⁦⁦Bernie Sanders’ stand and progressive advocacy, we will get checks for the American people. But let’s have the honesty and decency not to spin this package as a kind of victory or negotiation success. People have the right to expect more.”
—Rep. Ro Khanna

While the details of the relief agreement are not yet final, The Hill reported Thursday that McConnell is “getting much of what he wants in an emerging coronavirus relief package, after months of digging in his heels against a demand by Democratic leaders to pass a multi-trillion-dollar package that would shore up the ailing finances of state and local governments.”

“The GOP leader isn’t getting liability protection for businesses and other organizations but McConnell himself last week proposed dropping that controversial item along with another large tranche of funding for state and local government,” The Hill noted. “McConnell is getting a deal a lot closer to what Democrats dismissed as the ’emaciated’ plan he pushed in recent months than the $2.2 trillion HEROES Act that Pelosi and Schumer said should have been the ‘starting point’ of the talks.”

Congressional leaders have voiced confidence that they are close to finalizing a coronavirus relief deal and sweeping spending legislation to keep the government funded through next September. Lawmakers are likely to work into the weekend to complete both measures.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), one of few lawmakers who urged the Democratic leadership to run with the White House’s pre-election offer of a $1.8 trillion relief package, tweeted Thursday that “thanks to ⁦⁦Bernie Sanders’ stand and progressive advocacy, we will get checks for the American people” in the upcoming agreement.

“But let’s have the honesty and decency not to spin this package as a kind of victory or negotiation success,” Khanna added. “People have the right to expect more.”

Source: Democrats Urged to Fight for Bigger Relief Checks as Lame-Duck Trump Privately Backs Payments as Big as $2,000 | Common Dreams News

 

 

 

‘Republican Party Doesn’t Give a Damn About You’: McConnell Admits Direct Checks Only Included to Help GOP Win in Georgia 

‘Republican Party Doesn’t Give a Damn About You’: McConnell Admits Direct Checks Only Included to Help GOP Win in Georgia

“Given that this conversion only came after ‘Kelly and David got hammered,’ no one should be fooled—or let him get away with it.”

by Jake Johnson

After opposing another round of stimulus checks for months in the face of deteriorating economic conditions and widespread suffering, Republican congressional leaders have finally agreed to include direct payments in a coronavirus relief package that could be approved by the end of the week.

During a private GOP conference call Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) provided a straightforward and revealing reason for the sudden change of heart: “Kelly and David are getting hammered.”

McConnell was, of course, referring to Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, the Georgia incumbents now facing off against Democratic challengers Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff in runoff elections that conclude on January 5 and will determine control of the Senate.

“Continued Republican control means almost no chance at anything close to what we’ll need in new stimulus spending and economic assistance next year, when the economic damage and resulting misery could, if anything, spiral into something much worse.”
—Greg Sargent, Washington Post

The outcome of the two Georgia races—which are already driving record-shattering early voter turnout—could also determine whether Congress and the Biden administration are able to approve a relief package beyond the likely soon-to-be-finalized $900 billion measure, which progressive lawmakers and experts are criticizing as woefully inadequate.

As it stands, the relief bill would provide one-time direct payments of $600 per adult and $600 per child—significantly less than the $1,200 per adult and $500 per child under the CARES Act. The new package would also only extend emergency unemployment programs for 10 weeks as layoffs surge, setting the stage for another potential benefit lapse in the beginning of President-elect Joe Biden’s first term.

In a column on Wednesday, the Washington Post‘s Greg Sargent noted that “‘Kelly and David’ have indeed been getting hammered on [coronavirus relief]. Their Democratic opponents, Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff, have run numerous ads—see herehere, and here—hitting Republicans over the failure to pass more economic assistance.” Ossoff, as Common Dreams reported last week, has repeatedly hit Perdue over his opposition to the $1,200 checks provided under the CARES Act.

“It’s plainly obvious that this pressure is a key reason that Senate Republicans are now moving towards supporting the economic relief package (which is already far less than the country needs),” argued Sargent, who stressed that Democrats have been demanding another round of direct payments for months. “The basic question before us right now… is this: What would continued Republican control mean, and what would it mean if Democrats took control instead?”

“We have long known the answer: Continued Republican control means almost no chance at anything close to what we’ll need in new stimulus spending and economic assistance next year, when the economic damage and resulting misery could, if anything, spiral into something much worse,” Sargent wrote. “McConnell is now plainly hoping that passing this compromise proposal will obscure this basic truth. But, given that this conversion only came after ‘Kelly and David got hammered,’ no one should be fooled—or let him get away with it.”

As The American Prospect‘s David Dayen pointed out Thursday, McConnell’s remark also appears to indicate that if either Perdue or Loeffler had averted a runoff by winning outright in November—thus cementing GOP control of the Senate—there likely “wouldn’t be a relief package at all.”

Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-N.J.) also had harsh words for McConnell and his fellow Republicans:

McConnell’s admission that a major impetus behind the new relief bill is fear of losing the Georgia runoffs underscored the enormous stakes of the pair of races, which will come amid rising coronavirus infections and deaths, mass job loss, widespread hunger, and a looming eviction crisis.

“The fact that the Senate has obstructed direct economic relief now for going on eight months demonstrates how little they care about the economic plight of working people in this country.”
—Jon Ossoff

Observers have long feared that if he is allowed to keep control of the Senate, McConnell will deliberately impose austerity on the U.S. economy in the hopes of damaging Biden and boosting the GOP’s prospects in future elections.

Sawyer Hackett, a senior adviser to former presidential candidate Julián Castro, warned that McConnell’s comments Wednesday suggest he “is only playing ball on Covid relief because of the races in Georgia,” echoing other critics.

 

“If Dems don’t win there,” Hackett said, it “seems unlikely he comes to the table on future relief or other legislation.”

For weeks, progressives have argued that to win the Senate runoffs in Georgia, Ossoff and Warnock should make their support for $1,200 stimulus checks—and Republicans’ repeated obstruction of direct payments—a central component of their messaging.

“This strategy would ​give Democrats something they haven’t had in years: a clear message about something tangible that Democrats will do for you​, communicating how voting for Democratic candidates will make your life better,” reads a memo (pdf) released last month by a coalition of progressive organizations. “It would make the stakes of the runoffs crystal clear, directly tying votes for Warnock and Ossoff to something concrete that Democrats can and will deliver—actual results that people can see and feel.”

The two Democrats appear to be taking the groups’ advice. As The Hill reported earlier this week, “Both Ossoff and Warnock in recent days have been calling on Congress to pass a coronavirus relief package this year that includes direct payments to Americans.”

Responding to news Wednesday that congressional leaders are now planning to include direct payments in the next stimulus package, Ossoff said in an interview with CBS News, “The fact that the Senate has obstructed direct economic relief now for going on eight months demonstrates how little they care about the economic plight of working people in this country.”

“I wanna call upon Sen. Perdue to reverse his opposition” to direct payments, Ossoff continued.

In a new ad released Thursday on behalf of Ossoff and Warnock, Biden explicitly connects the Georgia runoff races to the prospect of future economic relief, warning that “there are folks in Congress threatening to do everything in their power to block our efforts.”

“Georgia, I know things are tough right now. But I want you to know help is on the way. My administration is preparing to beat Covid-19 and get economic relief to the American people,” says the president-elect. “Let me be clear: I need Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff in the United States Senate to get this done.”

Brian Beutler, editor-in-chief at Crooked Mediaargued Wednesday that while winning the Georgia runoffs “may be a necessary condition” to avert prolonged public health, economic, and political crises, “it’s not a sufficient one.”

“Upon winning Dems need to have unified resolve to do whatever they must to avoid a lost decade, including abolish the filibuster,” Beutler tweeted. “So, yes, win Georgia. But then apply the lessons of the past to save the country.”

Economists have argued that, at the very least, Congress must approve around $3-4.5 trillion in spending to lift the U.S. economy out of crisis and ensure a speedy recovery.

“The Senate’s failure to provide crucial relief and recovery aid has left families without a lifeline and will severely damage prospects for recovery,” Economic Policy Institute research director Josh Bivens said in a statement last month. “Policymakers should not phase out funding too quickly and must continue fiscal support through the end of 2024.”

Source: ‘Republican Party Doesn’t Give a Damn About You’: McConnell Admits Direct Checks Only Included to Help GOP Win in Georgia | Common Dreams News

 

 

 

As Trump Continues Killing Spree, Pressley Leads Call for Biden to Immediately Abolish Death Penalty 

As Trump Continues Killing Spree, Pressley Leads Call for Biden to Immediately Abolish Death Penalty

“Your historic election with record turnout represents a national mandate to make meaningful progress in reforming our unjust and inhumane criminal legal system,” wrote the lawmakers to Biden.

By Julia Conley

More than 40 Democratic lawmakers joined Rep. Ayanna Pressley late Tuesday in calling on President-elect Joe Biden to immediately abolish the federal death penalty upon taking office next month, bringing an end to a period of six months in which President Donald Trump has overseen more federal executions of people “than the total number executed over the previous six decades.”

Biden is opposed to capital punishment and has pledged to abolish its use at the federal level. In Pressley’s letter, the lawmaker emphasizes that Biden must make the policy change a top priority after January 20, when he will take office.

“The sheer number of executions set the Trump administration apart as an outlier in the use of capital punishment, compared both to the historical practices of American presidencies and the contemporary practices of the states in the Union.”
—Death Penalty Information Center

“With a stroke of your pen, you can stop all federal executions, prohibit United States Attorneys from seeking the death penalty, dismantle death row at [Federal Correctional Complex] Terre Haute, and call for the resentencing of people who are currently sentenced to death,” Pressley wrote. 

The letter was signed by lawmakers including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), and Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.). Recently elected Reps.-elect Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), and Cori Bush (D-Mo.) also signed the document.

The president is in the midst of what The Guardian called an “execution spree,” having killed three people—Orlando Hall, Brandon Bernard, and Alfred Bourgeois—since losing the presidential election on November 3. Before Biden takes office, Trump is planning to put to death inmates Lisa Montgomery, Corey Johnson, and Dustin Higgs. 

Trump is the first president to carry out the death penalty during a lame-duck session since 1889, when President Grover Cleveland executed a Native American named Richard Smith. 

Pressley sent the letter to Biden as the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) released a year-end report showing that Trump has killed more people in 2020 than all states that have carried out executions, combined—an unprecedented use of the death penalty by the federal government. 

Seven state executions were carried out in Alabama, Georgia, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas this year, while the president has killed 10 people since July, when he resumed the use of the federal death penalty after 17 years. 

“The sheer number of executions set the Trump administration apart as an outlier in the use of capital punishment, compared both to the historical practices of American presidencies and the contemporary practices of the states in the Union,” the DPIC wrote. “In addition, the details of the cases and the highly politicized manner in which they were carried out revealed significant problems in the application of the federal death penalty.”

 

The people Trump has put to death and plans to execute before his term is over—five Black men and one white woman—have been the subject of calls by global human rights advocates, prosecutors, and former jurors who have pleaded with the administration for clemency. 

Montgomery is the survivor of lifelong sexual and physical abuse and was experiencing psychosis, according to her lawyers, when she commited a murder in 2004. Bernard was 18 when he was involved in a kidnapping and killing of a couple in Texas, did not fire the gun that killed the victims, and has shown remorse for his crime. Bourgeois’s lawyers argue that he has a severe intellectual disability.  

“Capital punishment is unjust, racist, and defective,” Rep. Connolly said in a press release on Tuesday. “The United States stands alone among its peers in executing its own citizens, a barbaric punishment that denies the dignity and humanity of all people and is disproportionately applied to people who are Black, Latinx, and poor. For example, Black people make up less than 13% of the nation’s population while accounting for more than 42% of those on death row.” 

Trump’s executions have sparked outcry on social media in recent weeks.

National polls in recent years have seen support for capital punishment fall to record lows; 60% of respondents told Gallup in a survey in October 2019 that they preferred the use of life prison sentences over the death penalty, and a year earlier only 49% of Americans said they believed the death penalty was applied fairly.

“Your historic election with record turnout represents a national mandate to make meaningful progress in reforming our unjust and inhumane criminal legal system,” wrote the lawmakers to Biden. “Ending the barbaric practice of government-sanctioned murder is a commonsense step that you can and must take to save lives.”

Source: As Trump Continues Killing Spree, Pressley Leads Call for Biden to Immediately Abolish Death Penalty | Common Dreams News