‘Slap in the Face for People Suffering Across the Country’: Critics Slam Watered-Down Covid Relief Deal 

‘Slap in the Face for People Suffering Across the Country’: Critics Slam Watered-Down Covid Relief Deal

“Congress must pass this bill to address the immediate need, but let’s be clear: this should be considered a down payment at best.”

By Kenny Stancil

In the wake of Sunday night’s agreement on a roughly $900 billion Covid-19 relief package that is far smaller than economists say is necessary, progressives argued that the “slap-in-the-face” bill must be passed to help stem the suffering of working-class Americans but that much more will be needed to address the crisis that has claimed more than 300,000 lives and 20 million jobs in the United States so far.

“To say this relief package is a day late and a dollar short is an understatement to say the least,” said People’s Action director George Goehl in a statement released Sunday night.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his fellow congressional Republicans “prioritized the profits of the 1% over the well-being of everyone else since this pandemic began,” Goehl said. “The result is a diluted bill that’s barely a Band-Aid, but definitely a slap in the face for people suffering across the country.”

“When the history books are written about this pandemic,” Goehl added, McConnell and the GOP “will be remembered as heartless souls who played politics with people’s lives by blocking life-saving relief for months.”

The legislation includes $600 direct cash payments to Americans who earned $75,000 or less in 2019, though that hard-fought-for sum is meager compared to what other OECD countries have allocated to workers, including several nations that subsidized wages by 75% to 100% and didn’t have gaps of more than 260 days between relief packages.

In addition, the bill extends paid sick leave benefits and augments jobless benefits by $300 per week for 11 weeks, averting a catastrophic post-Christmas Day scenario in which 12 million people in the U.S. would lose unemployment insurance. It also provides much-needed funding—$10 billion for childcare, $13 billion for nutrition aid, $25 billion in rental assistance, and $82 billion for schools, as Common Dreams reported Sunday.

Progressives defeated the corporate immunity provision McConnell has spent months pushing for, but urgently needed fiscal aid for state and local governments was also cut from the bill.

Although specific details of the agreement are still emerging, the package will reportedly leave out hazard pay for frontline workers while the Washington Post reported Sunday that Republicans extracted tax deductions for “three-martini” business meal expenses “in exchange for… tax credits for low-income families.” And, according to Matt Bruenig of the People’s Policy Project, the legislation excludes 13.5 million adult dependents.

The bill is “not nothing, but it’s obviously inadequate…during an economic meltdown that has been punctuated by mass starvation and intensifying poverty,” the Daily Poster’s David Sirota wrote Sunday night. “For comparison, only three years ago, Republicans passed a $1.5 trillion tax cut that enriched the wealthiest 1% of households.”

AFSCME president Lee Saunders in a statement released Sunday night called the new Covid-19 relief package “a slap in the face to frontline public services workers—including nurses, first responders, sanitation workers, corrections officers, and others—who have risked their lives and livelihoods during this pandemic.”

 

While the pandemic-driven economic slowdown has led to sharp declines in tax revenue, states and localities do not share the federal government’s ability to run deficits. Citing the devastating impact of the crisis on municipal budgets across the country, Saunders pointed out that “already, 1.3 million frontline public service workers have been thanked for their heroism with pink slips, with more than a million more on the chopping block.”

“Congress has turned its back on out frontline heroes and the communities they serve,” Saunders said, adding that neighborhoods across the country will “pay the price with further job losses and cutbacks in essential services.”

The legislation could have been even worse, Goehl pointed out, had it not been for the advocacy of progressive elected officials like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and the Congressional Progressive Caucus as well as “grassroots organizations turning up the heat.”

“We fought tooth and nail to get people direct cash payments, even though we know a one-time, $600-per-person check isn’t nearly enough to survive,” Goehl noted. “We also pushed hard to make sure both extended and enhanced unemployment insurance and direct cash assistance were included instead of pitted against each other. By standing up for workers, we kept corporations accountable by rejecting the corporate liability shield.”

Goehl said that “Congress must pass this bill to address the immediate need, but let’s be clear: this should be considered a down payment at best.”

While the bill extends the CDC eviction moratorium through January 31 and provides $25 billion in emergency rental assistance, “Congress should have done much more to address the housing crisis faced by tens of millions of people,” he said. “We need a complete moratorium on evictions, rent and mortgage cancellation, and erasure of pandemic-related housing debts. Rental assistance just means the landlord gets paid with no strings attached, not even a commitment not to evict the tenant next month if they take the money.”

In addition, the People’s Action director emphasized the need for “funding for state and local governments to prevent deep cuts to essential local programs, services, and the workforce.”

Alluding to the significance of the January 5 runoff contests in Georgia that will determine which party controls the Senate, Goehl said progressives should be “ready to fight for robust relief and economic recovery under President-elect Biden.”

Sirota cautioned that “if Democrats don’t win the Georgia Senate races and gain control of the upper chamber… it will almost certainly become far harder to pass emergency relief bills through Congress.”

With Biden in the White House, Sirota said, the GOP will have “an even bigger incentive to try to starve the country for their own political gain.”

Source: ‘Slap in the Face for People Suffering Across the Country’: Critics Slam Watered-Down Covid Relief Deal | Common Dreams News

 

 

Day After GOP Senator Blocked Direct Payments Twice, Poll Shows 88% of Likely Voters Support More $1,200 Checks

Day After GOP Senator Blocked Direct Payments Twice, Poll Shows 88% of Likely Voters Support More $1,200 Checks

“Maybe—just maybe—it’s time Congress listened to the American people,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders.

By Jake Johnson

88% of likely voters say they would support Congress sending out another round of one-time $1,200 direct payments, data that came a day after Republican Sen. Ron Johnson twice blocked passage of a bill to provide such relief to working-class Americans.

Conducted by progressive think tank Data for Progress, the poll (pdf) finds that 93% of Democrats, 83% of Republicans, and 87% of likely independent/third party voters would support the distribution of “another one-time payment of $1,200 to most Americans as a coronavirus relief measure.” Just 9% of likely voters say they are opposed to another round of $1,200 direct payments.

“At this point, we should all wonder what it would take for members of Congress to listen to their constituents and support this. I support it, call your member to find out if they do too.”
—Rep. Ilhan Omar

“At this point, we should all wonder what it would take for members of Congress to listen to their constituents and support this,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) tweeted in response to the new survey. “I support it, call your member to find out if they do too.”

On Friday, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) attempted to obtain unanimous consent to pass legislation that would provide direct payments of $1,200 per adult and $500 per child, with eligibility modeled on the CARES Act.

Sanders and Hawley were both rebuffed by Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican who complained about the impact the direct payments and other coronavirus relief spending would have on the budget deficit.

On the Senate floor Friday, Sanders called out Johnson for objecting to direct relief payments but not President Donald Trump’s tax cuts, which blew a massive hole in the deficit for the benefit of wealthy Americans.

 

“The senator from Wisconsin talks about the deficit. Yet the senator from Wisconsin voted for over $1 trillion in tax breaks for billionaires and large, profitable corporations. That’s OK,” said Sanders. “The senator from Wisconsin voted for a bloated military budget, $740 billion. That’s OK. The senator from Wisconsin supports hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars in corporate welfare.”

In a tweet Saturday following the release of the Data for Progress survey, Sanders wrote, “Maybe—just maybe—it’s time Congress listened to the American people and sent $1,200 survival checks to working-class Americans who are in so much desperation right now.”

The poll confirming widespread support for $1,200 direct relief payments among the U.S. public came as Congress continued negotiating the final details of a nearly $1 trillion coronavirus aid package that includes direct payments of $600, an amount Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) called an “insult” to Americans who are struggling to afford food, housing, and other basic necessities.

“Our families deserve real survival checks. Six hundred dollars is hardly sufficient,” Pressley said in a speech on the House floor Thursday. “We must act to save lives now.”

Source: Day After GOP Senator Blocked Direct Payments Twice, Poll Shows 88% of Likely Voters Support More $1,200 Checks | Common Dreams News

 

 

 

 

Fewer Jobs, Rising Poverty: Scathing Report Finds Trump Economic Legacy ‘One of the Worst Among All US Presidents’ 

Fewer Jobs, Rising Poverty: Scathing Report Finds Trump Economic Legacy ‘One of the Worst Among All US Presidents’

“American businesses and workers are struggling to survive because President Trump refused to listen to advice from public health experts and economists about the best way to handle the coronavirus.”

By Jake Johnson

When President Donald Trump departs the White House next month, he will leave in his wake a nation devastated by a pandemic he failed to confront and an economic scene characterized by rising povertywidespread hunger, a looming eviction tsunami, and mass layoffs that have left the U.S. with fewer jobs than when his administration began.

And for that, a scathing new report (pdf) by Democrats on the congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC) argues, the outgoing president “only has himself to blame.”

Released Friday in response to the 2020 Economic Report of the President (pdf), the assessment of Trump’s economic performance during his four years in office runs directly counter to the rosy depiction frequently offered by the president himself, who seldom missed an opportunity to boast about the state of the stock market even in the midst of nationwide material suffering brought on by the coronavirus pandemic.

“American businesses and workers are struggling to survive because President Trump refused to listen to advice from public health experts and economists about the best way to handle the coronavirus,” Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), the incoming JEC chair, said in a statement. “In fact, his handling of the coronavirus will hurt the economy for years to come. That is President Trump’s economic legacy—one of the worst among all U.S. presidents.”

The new report examines Trump’s economic record dating back to the beginning of his administration, which began with soaring promises on jobs, trade, wages, healthcare, and other key policy matters.

While Trump inherited an steadily improving economy, the president “failed to pursue policies that would sustain and strengthen the economic expansion,” the JEC report argues.

As many analysts predicted before its passage and implementation, the $1.5 trillion Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that Trump signed into law in December of 2017 delivered most of its benefits to the rich and failed to produce anything resembling an economic boom.

“President Trump’s televised claim that the tax cuts would be ‘one of the great Christmas gifts to middle-income people’ proved to be deeply misleading,” the JEC report notes. “Analysis reveals that the tax cuts heavily favored the very wealthy, with the top 1 percent of households—those with average incomes of almost $2 million—projected to receive an average tax break of nearly $50,000 in 2020.”

“This is approximately 64 times the average tax cut of the middle 20 percent of households, who were projected to receive an average tax cut of $780,” the report continues. “The poorest 20 percent were projected to receive an average tax cut of just $60.”

 

Trump’s trade promises were similarly empty, the report finds. The president’s oft-touted trade war with China “resulted in hundreds of thousands of lost U.S. jobs.”

“A study by Moody’s Analytics found that by September 2019 it had cost the U.S. economy nearly 300,000 jobs,” the JEC notes.

While the president’s economic performance prior to the coronavirus pandemic was far from successful, Trump’s handling of the Covid-19 crisis and resulting economic collapse was catastrophic, pushing millions more into poverty and leaving countless Americans unable to afford basic necessities. At present, the U.S. has around 10 million fewer jobs than it did at the start of the pandemic.

The JEC observes that after Congress and the White House approved the $2.2 trillion CARES Act in March—providing a temporary $600-per-week boost to unemployment benefits and a round of one-time stimulus payments to many Americans—”the administration and Senate Republicans refused to work to negotiate another package until a few weeks before the expiration” of the unemployment supplement, a lapse that dramatically slashed the incomes of millions of people.

“The administration’s mismanagement of the coronavirus, and its grudging response to limit the resulting economic damage, have exposed and widened vast structural inequalities,” the report states. “Low-income workers and people of color have been most harmed by Covid-19 and the ensuing recession. They are more likely to be exposed to the virus, to be hospitalized and to die from it.”

The JEC Democrats conclude that “by all objective measures—job growth, unemployment, gross domestic product—President Trump leaves the economy in much worse condition than he found it.”

“However, the numbers do not tell the whole story—his failure to use the power of the presidency to fight the coronavirus will weigh down the U.S. economy for years to come,” the report says. “His successor will be left with an extraordinary challenge—to reverse the failures of the Trump administration. He must also move beyond them to ensure that the United States builds back better from this crisis, fully utilizing the talents and resources of all of its people to build an economy that is fairer, stronger, more inclusive, and more resilient.”

Source: Fewer Jobs, Rising Poverty: Scathing Report Finds Trump Economic Legacy ‘One of the Worst Among All US Presidents’ | Common Dreams News