How Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United Have Undermined American Democracy

How Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United Have Undermined American Democracy

In 1976, the Supreme Court ruled in Buckley v. Valeo that limits on individual contributions to candidates and political parties were constitutional, but limits on overall spending were not. This decision allowed for an increase in the amount of money spent on elections by corporations and unions.

In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United that corporations and unions have the same First Amendment rights as individuals, and that they can therefore spend unlimited amounts of money on independent expenditures in elections. This decision overturned a key part of the Buckley decision and led to a significant increase in the amount of money spent on elections by corporations and unions.

This increase in spending has had a number of negative effects on American democracy. It has made it more difficult for ordinary citizens to have a voice in the political process, and it has given corporations and unions an undue amount of influence. It has also led to a rise in negative advertising, which has made elections more negative and less informative.

These negative effects have led to a decline in public trust in government and a growing sense that the political process is rigged in favor of the wealthy and powerful.

The road to Citizens United was a long and winding one. It began in 2008, when Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit organization, released a film critical of then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. The film was titled “Hillary: The Movie.”

Citizens United wanted to air the film on television and make it available on DVD, but the Federal Election Commission (FEC) ruled that it could not do so because the film was considered an “electioneering communication” and corporations and unions were prohibited from spending money on electioneering communications.

Citizens United challenged the FEC’s ruling in court, and the case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court. In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United in a 5-4 decision. The Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.

Some of the most corrupt and oppressive politicians in office today are the beneficiaries of this system. They have been able to use wealth and power to gain influence in the political process. They have used this influence to advance their own agendas, often at the expense of the public good. They have also made it more difficult for ordinary citizens to hold them accountable.

Publicly funded elections would help to level the playing field and give ordinary citizens a greater voice in the political process. Under a publicly funded system, candidates would receive a set amount of money from the government, and would be prohibited from accepting private donations. This would prevent wealthy individuals and special interests from having an undue influence on elections, and would make it easier for ordinary citizens to run for office.

Publicly funded elections are not without their challenges. One challenge is that they can be expensive. However, the cost of publicly funded elections would be offset by the savings from eliminating the need to regulate campaign finance. Another challenge is that some people may argue that publicly funded elections violate the First Amendment right to free speech. However, the Supreme Court has already held that limits on campaign expenditures are constitutional, and there is no reason to believe that publicly funded elections would be any different.

In addition, there are a number of other reasons to support publicly funded elections. For example, public funding would help to reduce the influence of special interests in elections. It would also help to make elections more transparent, as all campaign spending would be publicly disclosed. Finally, public funding would help to make elections more accessible to all candidates, regardless of their financial resources.

 

Two Bills Filed in Massachusetts to Decriminalize or Legalize Prostitution

Two Bills Filed in Massachusetts to Decriminalize or Legalize Prostitution

Two bills have been filed in Massachusetts that would decriminalize or legalize prostitution. One bill, H.3499, would decriminalize prostitution by repealing all criminal penalties for people who engage in or offer to engage in prostitution. The other bill, S.983, would legalize prostitution by creating a licensing and regulatory system for sex workers.

H.3499: Decriminalization of Prostitution

H.3499 would decriminalize prostitution by repealing all criminal penalties for people who engage in or offer to engage in prostitution. This would mean that sex workers would no longer be arrested or prosecuted for selling sex.

HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1255        FILED ON: 1/18/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3499

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Kay Khan

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act decriminalizing prostitution.

_______________

PETITION OF:

Name: District/Address: Date Added:
Kay Khan 11th Middlesex 1/18/2017
Brian M. Ashe 2nd Hampden 3/27/2017
Ruth B. Balser 12th Middlesex 3/23/2017
Christine P. Barber 34th Middlesex 2/2/2017
Gailanne M. Cariddi 1st Berkshire 3/27/2017
Harriette L. Chandler First Worcester 3/27/2017
Sonia Chang-Diaz Second Suffolk 3/24/2017
Mike Connolly 26th Middlesex 3/22/2017
Julian Cyr Cape and Islands 3/24/2017
Marjorie C. Decker 25th Middlesex 2/3/2017
Sal N. DiDomenico Middlesex and Suffolk 3/24/2017
James B. Eldridge Middlesex and Worcester 2/1/2017
Tricia Farley-Bouvier 3rd Berkshire 2/2/2017
Danielle W. Gregoire 4th Middlesex 3/24/2017
Natalie Higgins 4th Worcester 3/24/2017
Mary S. Keefe 15th Worcester 2/2/2017
Jay D. Livingstone 8th Suffolk 3/24/2017
Joan B.  Lovely Second Essex 3/24/2017
James J. O’Day 14th Worcester 3/27/2017
David M. Rogers 24th Middlesex 2/3/2017
Aaron Vega 5th Hampden 3/22/2017
Bud Williams 11th Hampden 3/27/2017

HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 1255        FILED ON: 1/18/2017

HOUSE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 3499

By Ms. Khan of Newton, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3499) of Kay Khan and others relative to decriminalizing prostitution.  The Judiciary.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninetieth General Court
(2017-2018)

_______________

An Act decriminalizing prostitution.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 7 of chapter 4, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the following 2 clauses:-

Sixtieth, “Commercial sexual exploitation” shall mean any actual or attempted abuse of a position of vulnerability, differential power, or trust, for sexual purposes, including, but not limited to, profiting monetarily, socially or politically from the sexual exploitation of another.

Sixty-first, “Commercial sexual exploitation victim”, a person who is subjected to actual or attempted abuse of a position of vulnerability, differential power, or trust, for sexual purposes, including, but not limited to, profiting monetarily, socially or politically, including, but not limited to a prostitute, common street walker, common night walker, or a person who engages, agrees to engage or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee or in exchange for food, shelter, clothing, education or care.

SECTION 2. Section 66A of chapter 10 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended by inserting after the figure “265”, in line 20, the following words:- and a commercial sexual exploitation victim.

SECTION 3. Section 21 of chapter 119 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out, in lines 94 and 95, the words “, in violation of subsection (a) of section 53A of chapter 272,”.

SECTION 4. Section 39L of said chapter 119 is hereby repealed.

SECTION 5. Section 20M of chapter 233 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the figure “265”, in line 15, the following words:- or a commercial sexual exploitation victim.

SECTION 6. Section 8 of chapter 272 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2014 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out the word “shall”, in line 2, and inserting in place thereof the following words:- , except a commercial sexual exploitation victim whose body is solicited, shall.

SECTION 7. Section 53 of said chapter 272, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out subsection (a) and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-

(a) Whoever commits offensive and disorderly acts or language, accosts or annoy another person, lewd, wanton and lascivious persons in speech or behavior, keepers of noisy and disorderly houses, and persons guilty of indecent exposure shall be punished by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than 6 months, or by a fine of not more than $200, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

SECTION 8. Said chapter 272 is hereby amended by striking out subsection 53A and inserting in place thereof the following section:-

(a) Whoever pays, agrees to pay or offers to pay another person to engage in sexual conduct, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years or by a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $5,000, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

(b) Whoever pays, agrees to pay or offers to pay any person with the intent to engage in sexual conduct with a child under the age of 18, or whoever is paid, agrees to pay or agrees that a third person be paid in return for aiding a person who intends to engage in sexual conduct with a child under the age of 18, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 10 years, or in the house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years and by a fine of not less than $3,000 and not more than $10,000, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not; provided, however, that a prosecution commenced under this section shall not be continued without a finding or placed on file.

S.983: Legalization of Prostitution

S.983 would legalize prostitution by creating a licensing and regulatory system for sex workers. This would mean that sex workers would be required to obtain a license from the state in order to work.

The bill would also create a number of new programs and services to support sex workers. These programs could include:

  • Health care services
  • Mental health services
  • Legal services
  • Financial assistance
  • Housing assistance
  • Education and training

 

SENATE DOCKET, NO. 2050        FILED ON: 1/20/2023

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 983

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_________________

PRESENTED BY:

Cindy F. Friedman

_________________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:

The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:

An Act to strengthen justice and support for sex trade survivors.

_______________

PETITION OF:

Name: District/Address:
Cindy F. Friedman Fourth Middlesex
Lydia Edwards Third Suffolk
Robyn K. Kennedy First Worcester 1/30/2023
Joanne M. Comerford Hampshire, Franklin and Worcester 1/31/2023
Mathew J. Muratore 1st Plymouth 2/1/2023
Jacob R. Oliveira Hampden, Hampshire and Worcester 2/2/2023
Michael O. Moore Second Worcester 2/2/2023
Danillo A. Sena 37th Middlesex 2/15/2023
Jason M. Lewis Fifth Middlesex 2/27/2023
Brendan P. Crighton Third Essex 4/4/2023
Joan B. Lovely Second Essex 4/12/2023
Rita A. Mendes 11th Plymouth 5/17/2023

SENATE DOCKET, NO. 2050        FILED ON: 1/20/2023

SENATE  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  No. 983

By Ms. Friedman, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 983) of Cindy F. Friedman, Lydia Edwards, Robyn K. Kennedy, Joanne M. Comerford and other members of the General Court for legislation to strengthen justice and support for sex trade survivors.  The Judiciary.

 

[SIMILAR MATTER FILED IN PREVIOUS SESSION
SEE SENATE, NO. 940 OF 2021-2022.]

 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

 

_______________

In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)

_______________

 

An Act to strengthen justice and support for sex trade survivors.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
 

SECTION 1. Section 7 of chapter 4 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the sixty-first definition the following definition:-

Sixty-second, “prostituted person” shall mean any person who has been subjected to prostitution because such person: (i) is the victim of the crime of sexual servitude pursuant to section 50 of chapter 265 or is the victim of the crime of sex trafficking as defined in 22 U.S.C. 7105; (ii) engages, agrees to engage or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee, in violation of subsection (a) of section 53A of chapter 272 as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, or in exchange for food, shelter, clothing, education or care; (iii) is a victim of the crime, whether or not prosecuted, of inducing a minor into prostitution under by section 4A of chapter 272; or (iv) engages in common night walking or common streetwalking under section 53 of chapter 272 as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition.

SECTION 2. Section 55 of chapter 265 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out, in line 4, the words “section 50 or 51” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “section 50 or 51 of this chapter or section 8 or 53A of chapter 272”.

SECTION 3. Said section 55 of said chapter 265 is hereby further amended by adding the following paragraph:-

All monies used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of section 8 or 53A of chapter 272 that are not provided as restitution to victims shall be transmitted monthly by the courts to the state treasurer who shall then allocate the funds to the Massachusetts Office for Victim Assistance who shall, in turn, allocate the funds to the Victims of Human Trafficking Trust Fund.

SECTION 4. Section 56 of said chapter 265, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out, in lines 6, 8 to 9, 15, 19, 33 to 34, 43, 50 to 51, and 66, the words “section 50 or 51” and inserting in place thereof, in each instance, the following words:- “section 50 or 51 of this chapter or section 8 or 53A of chapter 272”.

SECTION 5. Section 4A of chapter 272 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out, in line 1, the word “prostitute” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “prostituted person”.

SECTION 6. Section 7 of said chapter 272, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out, in line 1, the word “prostitute” and inserting in place thereof the following words:- “prostituted person”.

SECTION 7. Said chapter 272, as so appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out section 8 and inserting in place thereof the following section:-

Section 8. Whoever solicits or receives compensation for soliciting for a prostituted person, except a prostituted person who is solicited, shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years, or by a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $5,000 or by both such imprisonment and fine.

SECTION 8. Section 53 of said chapter 272, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out subsection (a) and inserting in place thereof the following subsection:-

(a) Persons who with offensive and disorderly acts or language accost or annoy another person, lewd, wanton and lascivious persons in speech or behavior, keepers of noisy and disorderly houses, and persons guilty of indecent exposure, shall be punished by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than 6 months, or by a fine of not more than $200, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

SECTION 9. Section 53A of said chapter 272, as so appearing is hereby amended by striking out subsection (a).

SECTION 10. Section 107 of said chapter 272, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out, in line 2, the words “subsection (b) and subsection (c) of”.

SECTION 11. Section 100K of chapter 276 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out subsection (c) and inserting in place thereof the following subsections:-

(c) The court shall order an expungement pursuant to this section of a record created as a result of a criminal court appearance, juvenile court appearance or dispositions for charges of common street walking, under subsection (a) of section 53 of chapter 272 as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition, and for charges of sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee under subsection (a) of section 53A of chapter 272 as appearing in the 2020 Official Edition.

(d) The court shall forward an order for expungement pursuant to this section forthwith to the clerk of the court where the record was created, to the commissioner and to the commissioner of criminal justice information services appointed pursuant to section 167A of chapter 6.

SECTION 12. Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, there shall be a special commission to review and develop a set of recommendations to prevent, identify and respond to all forms of prostitution in the commonwealth. The special commission shall consist of 17 members: (i) the secretary of the executive office of health and human services or designee, who shall serve as a co-chair; (ii) the director of the Massachusetts office for victim assistance or designee, who shall serve as a co-chair; (iii) a representative of the office of the attorney general; (iv) a representative of the department of public health; (v) a representative of the department of housing and community development; (vi) a representative of the department of children and families; (vii) a representative of the department of mental health; (viii) a representative of the executive office of labor and workforce development; (ix) a representative of My Life My Choice; (x) a representative of Living in Freedom Together; (xi) a representative of the EVA Center; (xii) a representative from an organization focused on the needs of the LBGTQ+ community; (xiii) a representative from an organization dedicated to providing treatment to those with substance use disorder; (xiv) a representative of Boston Medical Center; (xv) a representative of the Massachusetts office of refugees and immigrants; (xvi) a representative from the committee for public counsel services; and (xvii) a victim witness advocate appointed by the Massachusetts office for victim assistance.

The special commission shall publish a report, which shall include, but not be limited to: (i) a review of existing government and non-government services related to the prevention, identification and support of prostituted persons and the effectiveness of such services; (ii) recommendations to increase and provide assistance to prostituted persons, including, but not limited to, housing and re-location services, physical and behavioral health care, education and job training, legal assistance, and victim compensation; (iii) strategies and best practices for launching a statewide prevention and awareness campaign that uses evidence-based educational programs and techniques to help deter youth from the commercial sex trade; and (iv) recommendations to increase existing organizations’ capacity to deliver survivor-of-prostitution-led exit programming that provides continuity of support services for survivors.

The special commission shall convene not later than 90 days after the effective date of this act and shall submit its findings and recommendations to the governor, the secretary of health and human services, the clerks of the senate and the house of representatives, the chairs of the joint committee on children, families and persons with disabilities and the chairs of the senate and house committees on ways and means not later than 18 months after the effective date of this act.

Benefits of the Bills for Sex Workers

Both H.3499 and S.983 would benefit sex workers in a number of ways. These benefits include:

  • Increased safety: Decriminalizing or legalizing prostitution would allow sex workers to work in a safer environment. They would be less likely to be arrested or harassed by law enforcement, and they would be able to access health care and other services without fear of being penalized.
  • Increased autonomy: Decriminalizing or legalizing prostitution would give sex workers more control over their lives. They would be able to choose where and when they work, and they would be able to set their own rates. This would give them more financial security and independence.
  • Reduced stigma: Decriminalizing or legalizing prostitution would reduce the stigma associated with sex work. This would make it easier for sex workers to access the resources they need and to live their lives freely.
  • Increased tax revenue: Decriminalizing or legalizing prostitution would generate tax revenue for the government. This revenue could be used to fund programs that benefit sex workers and society as a whole.

Conclusion

Both H.3499 and S.983 would have a number of benefits for sex workers. These benefits include increased safety, autonomy, reduced stigma, and increased tax revenue. 

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to legalize or decriminalize sex work is a complex one. There are a number of factors to consider, and there is no easy answer. However, it is important to have a thoughtful and informed discussion about this issue so that we can make the best decision for everyone involved.

 

Activate News May 17th, 2023 RachaelRollins, LegalizeProstitution, PrinceHarryNYC

Activate News May 17th, 2023 RachaelRollins, LegalizeProstitution, PrinceHarryNYC

Activate News for Wednesday, May 17th, 2023

Activate News is your independent source for news, free from the influence of corporations. We’re an all-volunteer radio station that originated at Occupy Boston, and we’re committed to bringing you the news that matters.

Here are some of the stories we’re covering today:

  • Massachusetts US Attorney Rachael Rollins resigns amid ethics probe
  • Massachusetts lawmakers are considering decriminalizing prostitution.
  • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle involved in car chase with paparazzi in NYC
  • Events!

Tune in at the top of the hour on Activate Radio to hear the latest from Activate News. You can find us online at activateradio.org.

We hope you’ll join us!

EVENTS

TODAY AT 7 PM
The Porch Southern Fare & Juke Joint Medford

Event by Tony Savarino

TODAY AT 7:30 PM
Midway Cafe Jamaica Plain

Event by Midway Cafe

TODAY AT 8 PM
Silhouette Lounge Allston

Event by Ibookthings

TOMORROW AT 7 PM
Regent Theatre Arlington Arlington

Event by Arlington Community Media, Inc.

TOMORROW AT 8 PM
Faces Brewing Co. Malden

Event by Faces Brewing Co.

TOMORROW AT 8 PM
Sally O’Brien’s Somerville

Event by The Haymakers

FRI, MAY 19 – MAY 20
Harpoon Brewery Boston

Event by Harpoon Brewery

THIS FRIDAY AT 7 PM
Magic Room Norwood

Event by Magic Room

THIS FRIDAY AT 7:30 PM
Harvard-Epworth United Methodist Church Cambridge

Event by Massachusetts Peace Action

THIS FRIDAY AT 8 PM
Midway Cafe Jamaica Plain

Event by Midway Cafe

THIS FRIDAY AT 8 PM
Faces Brewing Co. Malden

Event by Faces Brewing Co.

THIS FRIDAY AT 8 PM
The Square Root Roslindale

Event by Terry Kitchen

THIS FRIDAY AT 9 PM
The Jungle Community Music Club Somerville

Event by The Jungle Community Music Club

THIS SATURDAY AT 8 AM
Long Wharf Boston

Event by Boston Harbor Now